Skip to main content

Week 4: Pre-Lab

By
Some new design considerations were taken into account in order to test a proposed idea with smaller diameter heat pipes. After doing some basic research it was determined that capillary action has a greater effect the smaller your system gets. Larger diameter heat pipes will still experience capillary action but other factors such as gravity will have different effects on how the working fluid flows in the wick. The diagram in Figure 1 illustrates the proposed problem with larger diameter heat pipes compared to their smaller counterparts.
Figure 1: Large and Small Heat Pipe Capillary Force Comparison

By reducing the pipe diameter to half of Prototypes 1 and 2, capillary action should be able to happen more efficiently due to surface tension and lower liquid weight (less volume in a smaller pipe). Gravitational effects overcoming surface tension demonstrated in Figure 1 is why we believe that a smaller heat pipe would theoretically run more efficiently. Furthermore, as temperature goes up, the effects of surface tension goes down. Relating to larger heat pipes with wicks, a significant decrease in surface tension would be detrimental to the efficiency and function of the heat pipe during operation. Further into the term, the team will conduct efficiency tests at different temperature ranges to hopefully demonstrate that principle.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 5: Lab

By
The team conducted some more tests on Prototype 2 as it was the best performing heat pipe constructed thus far. The test was conducted in the angled orientation as Prototype 2 hadn't been tested in that configuration yet. The results were promising as Prototype 2 exceeded expectations and transferred heat effectively throughout the test. The condenser end increased by 52 degrees over 300 seconds which was an improvement over the horizontal test conducted with Prototype 2. In both tests, the difference between the condenser temperature and the evaporator temperature was calculated and displayed on the graphs. The graph below shows the first test for Prototype 2. To verify our results the test was run a second time but for a longer period of time in order to narrow down on where the heat pipe's maximum operating temperature would be. The results are shown below. For Prototype 2, the effective temperature limit of the heat pipe can be approximated to 125 F without a hea...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 6: Lab

By
This week in lab, the team worked on some more testing and the construction of our final iteration of the heat pipe. A specially designed bushing had to be machined to accept the threads of the 1/8" NPT ball valve. This bushing was then soldered into the copper tube. Another angled test of Prototype 2 was conducted to compare the results from the previous tests. The data is shown below: The graph of this data is shown below: The fluctuation of T1(the temperature at the evaporating end) may be partially due to experimental error. Otherwise, this prototype performed as expected.
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 7

By
This week in lab the team finished the construction of the final heat pipe design and was able to find a vacuum pump to test how a heat pipe would perform under vacuum. Unfortunately, the results were not promising as the new heat pipe did not nearly work as it was expected to. For the final heat pipe, one end is closed, while the other end is equipped with a valve, as shown below, that can be used to add working fluid and connect to the vacuum pump to create vacuum. After the air is pumped out, the heat pipe is tested with acetone and with water as working fluids. The result is not as well as expected. More experiments will be conducted on this heat pipe next week. The results of the experimentation done are shown below:
Post a Comment
Read more