Skip to main content

Week 2

By

In week 2, the team discussed the timeline and final deliverables of this project.

Project Timeline

The project timeline is shown below in Table 1.
Table 1: Project Timeline



The main tasks of the project include research, initial design, ordering of material, generation of a CAD model, construction, testing, design optimization and the final report preparation stage. Research will be done throughout the first few weeks to aid the design, simulation and construction processes. Components are ordered this week, and it will take on average a few days to a week to arrive. We have started to build the CAD model using Autodesk Fusion 360 and Solidworks software.
For the construction and testing phase, two prototypes and one final model will be built in the course of six weeks. The first prototype will be constructed in week 3, and tested in week 4. Then, the second prototype will be made in week 5 and tested in week 6. The final model of the heat pipe will be made in week 7 and tested in week 8. Testing the different prototypes and the final model will enable adjustment to be made to make the heat pipe more efficient. The last weeks will be when the team prepares for the final project and presentation.

Deliverables

The planned deliverables for the Heat Pipe project are as follow:
  • CAD Models of the Heat Pipe Designs
  • Prototype 1
    • Heat pipe sealed at both ends to test the functionality of the mesh and the heatsink
    • Liquid volume permanently sealed within the pipe
    • Crimped and soldered ends of the pipe
  • Prototype 2
    • Heat pipe with one sealed end and one resealable end to test the working fluid
    • One cap is threaded with an o-ring seal
  • Testing Results and Performances
    • Working fluid comparisons with efficiency and time
  • Final Model: 
    • Functional heat pipe with the best composition of working fluid based on lab results

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 5: Lab

By
The team conducted some more tests on Prototype 2 as it was the best performing heat pipe constructed thus far. The test was conducted in the angled orientation as Prototype 2 hadn't been tested in that configuration yet. The results were promising as Prototype 2 exceeded expectations and transferred heat effectively throughout the test. The condenser end increased by 52 degrees over 300 seconds which was an improvement over the horizontal test conducted with Prototype 2. In both tests, the difference between the condenser temperature and the evaporator temperature was calculated and displayed on the graphs. The graph below shows the first test for Prototype 2. To verify our results the test was run a second time but for a longer period of time in order to narrow down on where the heat pipe's maximum operating temperature would be. The results are shown below. For Prototype 2, the effective temperature limit of the heat pipe can be approximated to 125 F without a hea...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 1

By
The primary focus of week 1 was to research the existing designs of a heat pipe, understand the mechanisms at which they operate, and come up with ideas to build an efficient low temperature heat pipe. The main purpose of the heat pipe is to transfer heat from one place to another. Research was conducted on low-temperature applications and the advantage and disadvantage of different designs. After analyzing the information and taking into account the time and budget restriction for this project, an initial design of the heat pipe was generated.  The heat pipe will be made of copper tubing with mesh inside the tubes to serve as a wick. There will also be Aluminum heatsink fins at the condenser end to increase surface area for the spreading of heat to the surrounding. The main tasks include research, initial design, ordering of material, generation of CAD model, construction, testing, and optimization. The design and construction of the heat pipe are limited to a budget of $400 ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 4: Lab

By
This week, prototype 3 and 4 were constructed and tested. As shown in the image below, the shorter one, prototype 4, has a length of 1 foot and the longer one, prototype 3, has a length of 2 feet. The effect of the length of the heat pipe on its efficiency is tested this week. Below is the tables and graphs of the testing done in lab this week. From the test results, it can be concluded that prototype 4 performed better than prototype 3. In 240 seconds, prototype 4 had a temperature increase of 12 degrees, while prototype 3 increased only 2 degrees. A possible reason is that the because the prototype 3 is longer in length, and so heat transfer takes longer. It is also possible due to heat loss along the length of the heat pipe.
Post a Comment
Read more